GC Learning Industry Report Sources

Learning Industry Findings, Part II

Second Finding

Informal education settings are the most recommended by Learning Industry Experts.

Recap of the 2022 Learning Industry Report and the first-finding:

This 3-part series is based on findings from a survey conducted of a select group of Learning Industry professionals. In the first part, we established details about the participants – most are instructional designers or in a management role, with over 8 years of experience.

Click here for a copy of the 2022 Learning Industry Report.

In the first part of this series, we provided some background on how this report came to be:

    • We want to help people enter the Learning Industry
    • We set out to find ways to help those people – we decided to connect with people already in the industry 
    • Our initial finding was most people who completed the survey were in Instructional Design or Management roles
    • A large majority with 8+ years experience

Second Key Finding

Survey Findings:

With the third survey question, participants were asked to share sources for learning about the industry and roles within it.

What was asked:

Where would you recommend someone just starting out go to learn more about your role?

Why we asked this question:

We wanted to know what participants would suggest doing and where to go to learn more about the industry and the core roles involved.

Results:

With a 97% response rate, most provided links and specific names of organizations, corporations, and businesses; public, private, and personal.

To evaluate and compare responses, we grouped and categorized the responses using common attributes – Setting and Format (see site for definitions).

  • For Setting, we focused on the Education Type; Formal, Informal, and Non-formal.
    • We then assigned each a sub-type:
      • Group/Organization
      • Personal
      • Self-driven
  • For Format, we categorized responses based on how the content is provided; via a website, through an app, or a profession-based services.
    • Specific brands and professional groups were mentioned frequently among recommended sources.
Biggest Surprise:

While most respondents recommended the Informal education type, we focused on the responses for Non-formal type, as this is more relevant to the project.

Within the Non-formal education type, the results show Self-driven is the preferred sub-type. Further, most respondents with over 8-years experience (nearly 60%) recommended the Non-formal education type, with an even split between the Group/Organization, Personal, and Self-driven sub-types.

LinkedIn was the most mentioned brand among all recommended sources with 12%.

Impact:

Having a list of specific recommended resources with the named source helped solidify some of the project hypotheses and provided real-world examples to be shared with others, especially those entering the industry.

Why this matters to you

Activity:

In the industry?
  • Conduct a thought exercise of how you have come to gain your knowledge and skillset.
  • What were the steps and resources you used to better understand the industry and your role in it?
  • Which do you use today?
Looking to enter the industry?
  • What are the steps you would take to find out about the industry or a particular role?
  • There are the obvious starting points (Google, Wikipedia, Reddit, etc.), but how would you gain a deeper understanding? Where would you look and who would you look to?
  • Think about your preferred setting and format. Do you like self-paced experiences, live cohorts, or something in between? – maybe that’s a good starting point.

Next:

Please look for the third and final part of this series. We’ll cover our third key finding – expert advice – and summarize the series.

Thanks for reading and please contact us if you would like to connect on this series and our findings.